We were told that it ‘might’ happen.
Then we were told that it ‘could’ happen.
Then we were told it ‘would’ happen.
And, in the end of 2014, it finally ‘did’ happen.
The ‘it’ was an act or acts of terrorism on Australian soil in the
21st Century. We have been on stand-by for such an event ever since 9/11 and
Australia’s entry into the ‘war on terror.’
The build-up to the terrorist act in 2014 has taken a while but it
began to unravel very quickly. For a country who has been normally far apart
from the global trouble, Australia has had its fair share of drama lately.
Consider the following events in just since September 2014:
• Australian police conducted early-morning counter-terrorism raids in
Brisbane, Sydney, and Melbourne;
• Prime Minister Tony Abbott committed 600 troops to a 40 nation
US-led coalition against the Islamic State (IS). In return, IS has urged its
supporters to kill civilians and soldiers of these nations.
• For the first time since 2002, Australia raised its terrorism alert
to ‘High,’ meaning that a terrorist event was likely, though not imminent;
• 18 year old Abdul Numan Haider from Afghanistan was shot dead
outside the Narre Warren police station in suburban Melbourne after stabbing
two police officers;
• Then, on 15 December Man Haron Monis from Iran, age 50, went to the
Lindt Cafe at Martin Place in the heart of Sydney’s central business district
-- near Channel 7, the Australian Reserve Bank, plus other major banks - and
kept 18 people hostage for 16 hours before police stormed the building and
killed Monis. Two hostages, cafe manager Tori Johnson and barrister Katrina
Dawson were also killed.
For the ‘laid-back’ ‘lucky country,’ this was a disturbing,
unprecedented development, even if it were not totally unexpected.
What can we make of all this?
First, the Martin Place siege was clearly seen as an act of
political violence, namely terrorism. While it is common to say that Monis was
a ‘lone wolf’ with no known connections with terrorist groups, he got his
marching orders when IS called its supporters to attack civilians and soldiers
in countries that supported the US-led attack. This includes Australia. In
their English-language magazine Dibaq, Islamic
State applauded Monis’s actions, as well as of Abdul Numan Haider (did the
latter plan to kill and then behead the two policemen that he knifed before he
was shot?). Both Monis and Haider supported IS. In fact, just before his final
act at Martin Place, Monis converted from Shia (the main branch of Islam in
Iran) to Sunni Islam, just as the strongly-Sunni Islamic State would want.
Since terrorism is defined as violent criminal activity with political motives,
the Sydney siege clearly fits that description.
Dr. Mark Durie gives some insightful comments about the ‘lone wolf’
label:
Also
misleading is the widely used term lone wolf, which implies social
disengagement and dysfunction, including disconnection with the broader jihadi
movement. This very western secular construct overlooks the considerable
attention in Islamic jurisprudence to the idea of warfare as an ‘individual
obligation’ (fardh al-’ayn), which is incumbent upon Muslims as individuals,
even if they are not enlisted in a jihad army.
--
From Broken Hill to Martin Place: Individual Jihad Comes to Australia, 1915 to
2015, http://blog.markdurie.com/2014/12/individual-jihad-comes-to-australia.html Accessed 1 January 2015
Second, the response of the Australian public to the tragedy has been
heartwarming, especially the flora tributes and monetary contributions sent to
the foundations established by the families of the two slain hostages. At the
same time, the Australian public has right to ask questions about the
government’s policy - in immigration, social security, and the judicial system.
Monis had a history of promoting jihad (he apparently had more Facebook
followers (or likes) than the premier of New South Wales Mike Baird). He
exploited the legal system, tormented by post the relatives of soldiers killed
in Afghanistan, engaged in sexual assault, and was an accused accessory to the
murder of his ex-wife. Questions can include:
With such a scorecard of
criminal activity, why was he out on bail when he committed his
terrorist/jihadist act?
When was the last time he
was gainfully employed - a decade ago?
Why was he allowed to
promote jihad while living off the Australian taxpayer?
Most importantly, why was a
man with a lawbreaking background in Iran allowed to stay in Australia in the
first place? (Apparently, the Iranians warned the
Australia about him before he was granted asylum.)
Third, with the advent and acceleration of globalisation, not only
are national economies linked but also national problems become international
problems. Jihad is a transnational phenomena. From Nigeria to Mali to Libya to
Somalia, Yemen, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan, jihad is causing an
inter-Muslim world war. Yet it does not remain in these places - just like
Ebola, extremist ideologies can spread. Even if jihadist has medieval ideas,
their social media skills are 21st Century, and this means the spreading of
their ideas is even more rapid.
So even far away Australia is not too far anymore. In essence, the
Martin Place siege crossed a line - Australia’s geography, global status, ‘fair
go’ reputation, an ‘unaligned’ aligned nation, no longer afford it protection
it once enjoyed from the violence that plagues other parts of the world.
Recently, before I led my 24th tour to the holy land, I was asked
the understandable question: is it safe
to go? People were thinking of the war with Hamas, the rise of the Islamic
State, civil war in nearby Syria, continued regional instability, and wondering
if it is too risky. To the question ‘is it safe’ my reply is simply this: it is
safe enough.
With events that were listed above, is Australia safe? With the
Americans giving a travel advisory to the ‘world’s most live-able city,’
Melbourne, is it safe enough? When you consider what happened at Martin Place -
Sydney’s sacred secular space, normally light-years away from the world’s
trouble spots - is there any place on this troubled planet that is perfectly
safe anymore?
For people of Biblical faith, there is an understanding that there
is one sure safe place. You can’t get there by car, train, or plane; only by
faith. It is described in Psalm 91:1 as the ‘secret place of the Most High’ and
the ‘Shadow of the Almighty.’ Once you enter in, you don’t have to worry about
being safe enough - you are safe indeed.
Thank you Kameel most insightful and decisive when others are pondering what is happen really!
ReplyDeleteGod bless you and yes indeed there is only one truly 'safe place' in Him.
Thanks for your kind comments. Hope you will continue to read my blogs.
ReplyDeleteThank you for the assurance of Psalm "911" at the end of the blog.
ReplyDeleteHope to see you again soon, Dr. Kameel.
Jeannette Tai (Double Portion Tour 2013)