Skip to main content

No Safe Space: The Prayer for Trump Part 01




Franklin Graham, son of Billy Graham, called for a day of prayer for US President Donald Trump on June 2nd 2019. Mr. Trump has been under a heavy barrage from a variety of opponents: Congressional Democrats who are eager, if not desperate, to impeach him; the Deep State of entrenched bureaucrats and high-up government officials who feel their turf is threatened, the mainstream media whose negative coverage is 91%, and even members of his own political party, called by the acronym RINO (Republic In Name Only). Let’s not forget the ‘never-Trumpers,’ too. While all Presidents face opposition, impartial observers following events in the US should admit that Trump’s opposition has gone to a whole new level of ferocity. Hence, the day of prayer.

'He's our president,' Graham added in a Twitter video clip, 'and if he succeeds we all benefit. But if his enemies are allowed to destroy him and pull down the presidency it will hurt our entire nation.' Graham said, 'Many thousands of churches' would take part in the targeted prayer sessions. 

On that very Day of Prayer, Mr. Trump made an unscheduled, impromptu stop at the mega McLean Bible Church in Vienna, Virginia, near Washington DC. Once hearing of the President’s imminent arrival, the senior pastor, Dr. David Platt, only had a matter of minutes to gather his thoughts and make a decision what to do next. The decision: to offer a beautiful prayer for Mr. Trump.The President made no public comments; he merely thanked the pastor and departed after being in the church for only 11 minutes.

Then the backlash began.

For President Trump, backlash, verbal attacks, insults, are all in a day’s work. Yet for Dr. Platt he was criticised within and without his congregation. The pastor seemed concerned that he caused ‘hurt’ to some in his congregation who, for a ‘variety of valid reasons,’ were unhappy with the decision to pray for Trump. So Dr. Platt penned a pastoral letter to the congregation - confessing his love for every church member, acknowledging the hurt, reassuring them that his prayer was in faithfulness to Scripture and in no way an endorsement of President Trump, his policies, and/or the Republican Party.

At the same time, Pastor Platt was criticised by outsiders that thought he was appeasing those who were disgruntled in the congregation. No matter what the pastor did, there would be criticism.

Then there were those who had no comment to make about prayer. Instead, they were mesmerised by the President’s new hair style, which allegedly broke the internet!

While there were many high-profile ministries who endorsed the ‘Day of Prayer for the President Trump,’ McLean was not one of them. Pastor Platt said regarding the day of prayer: 'Many of you may have seen that there were calls to, particularly on this Sunday, pray for our president. We don't want to do that just on this Sunday. We want to do that continually, day in and day out….  And then he proceeded to pray for the President, in-person.

It is not clear why the President did not choose a more ‘Trump-friendly’ church, where the backlash possibly would be less, although there were no guarantees.

In an age of seeking ‘safe-space,’ couldn’t the church be a haven, oasis, a ‘cave of Adullam,’ a ‘refuge from the storms?’ Apparently, not when it comes to Donald Trump.

What are we to make of this situation? There are several takeaways.

DIVISION: There is no question that many consider Donald Trump to be divisive leader. Yet, he is by no means is alone; several modern US Presidents were called the same thing. Leftists and progressives are united in their opposition to him for his policies and personhood. Yet, even among conservative whose cause Trump champions there is disunity, though for different reasons - more about his personhood than his policies. Even Christian families are divided - one pastor admitted, ‘I can’t even talk to my (adult) children about Trump.’ And he’s from Canada!

People can be divisive because they are evil troublemakers who revel in strife. They have a ‘divide and conquer’ mentality. Some are divisive because they ‘dare to be different.’ Yet there are people who are ‘divisive’ because they take a strong, courageous principled stance on a major issue in time of crisis— and the other side reacts strongly. Some of history’s greatest leaders were called ‘divisive’ during their time in power.

This author leaves it with the reader to decide which category fits Donald Trump.

When it comes to ‘division,’ remember the words of the Saviour Himself:

Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division: 52For from henceforth there shall be five in one house divided, three against two, and two against three — Luke 12:51-52.

Divisive people who are strong and principled are in good company.

In our next edition, we will look at the commands of Scripture and what is a God-honouring attitude towards leadership.

TO BE CONTINUED.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Operation Epic Fury: Was the War between Iran and the US / Israel Inevitable?

It was the Sabbath morning in Israel when the air raid sirens were activated, beckoning the population to their closest bomb shelter. War had broken ou between Israel and its archenemy, Iran. Operation Epic Fury (US name) had begun. And for the first time, Israel was not fighting alone but alongside itsgreat ally, the United States. Comparisons have been frequently made between Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Sir Winston Churchill with US Presidents Franklin D. Roosevelt and Donald J. Trump. If the current leadership wins its war as World War II leaders won theirs, the comparison will hold. Operation Epic Fury was meticulously designed and flawlessly executed, using multi-domain warfare (cyber, outer space, and AI). With the failure of negotiations, Israel and the US sincerely believed that Iran was a growing threat, so they swung into action. Israel sent out two hundred flights, and each plane had two targets each. In amazingly swift speed, the allies sank Iran’s navy a...

FALL FROM GRACE: WHAT’S NEXT FOR EX-PRINCE ANDREW?

It was like a nuclear explosion. First is the impact, then the mushroom cloud, followed by the fallout. For the first time in the 1,000-year history of the British monarchy, a close member of the royal family was arrested for alleged criminal conduct. Where it is going and how it will end is anyone’s guess.   Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor (AMW), previously known as Prince Andrew, was arrested on 19 February for possible ‘misconduct in public office’. This stems from his past relationship with disgraced financier and convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. As of yet, Andrew has not been charged with any crime, but neither has he been cleared either. Multiple police investigations are underway. Born into immense wealth and privilege, until last year, Andrew had known only royal life. Yet on the day of his arrest, 19 February 2026, he was treated like a common man. Pronounced under arrest, his two residences - Royal Lodge (Windsor) and Wood Farm (Sandringham) - were searched, and all electr...

Dealmaker? Peacemaker?: Trump and the Middle East

His name is a household word, and it is rare for people, both Americans and non-Americans, to be neutral. They either dislike him intensely or love him wholeheartedly. Yet, regardless of your opinion, Donald Trump is the most colourful man to occupy the Oval Office in modern times.   First elected as US President in 2016 on the coattails of Brexit, his first term in office (2017-2021) was eventful and turbulent. He worked hard and fought hard, and, unlike many career establishment elite politicians, the New York ‘blue collar’ billionaire, Donald Trump, related to everyday Americans, the working class, minorities, and Generation Z young people. That’s how he won two presidential elections, despite being a political outsider. Having left the White House after the disputed 2020 presidential election (one that he never conceded), Trump was considered politically dead. The obstacles to a political comeback were enormous: a second impeachment over the January 6th riot at the Capitol Buil...